Latest revenue
$1.47B
as of 2025-11-01
Latest net income
$-7.0M
as of 2025-11-01
Net margin
-0.5%
as of 2025-11-01
Community sentiment
Where do you think VSCO is heading?
Keep private notes on VSCO — thesis, target price, catalysts to watch.
Visible only to you. Never shared. Never used to train AI.
VSCO vs S&P 500 · rebased to 100
Live market
delayed ≤15 min- Market cap
- $4.32B
- Enterprise value
- $4.40B
- P/E (trailing)
- 26.8×
- Forward P/E
- —
- P/B
- 5.05×
- Dividend yield
- 0.0%
- 52-wk high
- $81.28
- 52-wk low
- $17.53
- Beta
- —
- Shares out
- 79.5M
What this company does
ITEM 1. BUSINESS. General Victoria’s Secret & Co. (together with its subsidiaries unless the context otherwise requires, “we”, “us”, “our” or the “Company”) is a specialty retailer of women’s intimates and other apparel and beauty products marketed under the Victoria’s Secret, PINK and Adore Me brand names. We have approximately 860 stores in the United States (“U.S.”), Canada and China, as well as our own websites, www.VictoriasSecret.com, www.PINK.com, www.AdoreMe.com and www.DailyLook.com, and other digital channels worldwide. Additionally, we have more than 560 stores in approximately 70 countries operating under franchise, license and wholesale arrangements. The Company also includes…
AI summary unavailable — showing raw filing excerpt
Generated from VSCO's filing dated 2026-03-20
Key risks
Table of Contents ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS. RISK FACTORS Investing in our common stock or other securities involves risk. You should carefully consider each of the following risks and all of the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K when evaluating our business. Our business, prospects, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows could be materially and adversely affected by any of these risks, as well as additional risks and uncertainties that are not described in this Annual Report because they are not presently known to us or we currently deem them immaterial. Risks Relating to Our Business Our business is impacted by general economic conditions, and…
AI summary unavailable — showing raw filing excerpt
Generated from VSCO's filing dated 2026-03-20
ActaClear Score
Computed from 5 years of SEC fundamentals + latest market data, ranked within Retail-Women's Clothing Stores (2 peers). 10 = best in industry, 5 = median, 0 = worst. Refreshed Jun 10, 2026.
Fair value · DCF
Methodology + caveats (click to expand)
Method. 10-year forecast of free cash flow, discounted at the company's WACC, with a Gordon-growth terminal at year 10. FCF is proxied by last fiscal-year net income (proper FCF needs CFO − CapEx by year, which we don't store yet). Beta defaults to 1.0 when not reported.
Why DCF is fragile. Treat the output as a thinking aid, not a verdict. Honest weaknesses of any DCF:
- Growth is the dominant assumption. No one can foresee 10 years of growth — small changes in the slider can double or halve fair value. The reverse-DCF readout above tells you what the market is implicitly assuming; ask yourself whether that's realistic before trusting either number.
- Terminal value dominates. In most DCFs, 60-80% of the answer comes from the terminal-value calculation — i.e., everything AFTER year 10. A 0.5pp change in terminal growth, or in WACC, can swing fair value by 20-30%.
- WACC is itself a guess. We use a textbook CAPM cost of equity (Rf 4.3%, MRP 5.5%, β from the quote) plus a 6% pretax cost of debt — none of these are the company's actual marginal financing cost.
- No moat / disruption modelling. The model assumes the company keeps earning whatever it earns today, compounding cleanly. Competitive shifts, regulatory action, and technology disruption can invalidate the forecast overnight.
- Net income ≠ free cash flow. For capex-heavy names (semis, telcos) net income overstates distributable cash. For low-capex names (software) it understates. Both reduce the precision of the FV figure.
- Reflexivity. A high stock price often becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy via better hiring, financing, and customer trust. DCF can't see this.
Take the DCF, the reverse-DCF implied growth, the historical multiples, and the community sentiment together. When they agree, conviction. When they disagree, the disagreement is the most informative thing on the page.
Historical multiples
How does VSCO's current valuation compare to its own past?
P/E uses year-end weekly close ÷ (net income ÷ shares outstanding today). Held shares constant at today's count, which understates the per-share earnings improvement from buybacks over the period. PEG uses 5y revenue CAGR as a proxy for EPS growth — close, but not identical (margin expansion or dilution can drive a wedge). Best read as a comparator across companies and industries, not as a precise replica of historical multiples.