Latest revenue
$22.0M
as of 2026-03-31
Latest net income
$5.2M
as of 2026-03-31
Net margin
23.5%
as of 2026-03-31
Community sentiment
Where do you think TUSK is heading?
Keep private notes on TUSK — thesis, target price, catalysts to watch.
Visible only to you. Never shared. Never used to train AI.
TUSK vs S&P 500 · rebased to 100
Live market
delayed ≤15 min- Market cap
- $152.6M
- Enterprise value
- $59.9M
- P/E (trailing)
- 33.2×
- Forward P/E
- —
- P/B
- 0.58×
- Dividend yield
- 0.0%
- 52-wk high
- $3.92
- 52-wk low
- $1.72
- Beta
- —
- Shares out
- 45.8M
What this company does
Item 1. Business Overview We are an integrated, growth-oriented services company focused on providing products and services to our customers primarily in the oil and natural gas, aviation and utility infrastructure industries. Our primary business objective is to drive returns through improved execution by prioritizing asset utilization, margin expansion, and capital efficiency across the portfolio. Our suite of services includes rental services, infrastructure services, natural sand proppant services, accommodation services and drilling services. Our rental services segment provides a wide range of equipment used in oilfield, construction and aviation activities. Our infrastructure…
AI summary unavailable — showing raw filing excerpt
Generated from TUSK's filing dated 2026-03-06
Key risks
Item 1A. Risk Factors Described below are certain risks that we believe apply to our business and the industries in which we operate. You should carefully consider each of the risks described below in conjunction with other information including the financial statements and related notes provided in this Annual Report and in our other public disclosures. The risks described below highlight potential events, trends or other circumstances that could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity, and consequently, the market value of our common stock. These risks could cause our future results to differ materially from historical results and…
AI summary unavailable — showing raw filing excerpt
Generated from TUSK's filing dated 2026-03-06
ActaClear Score
Computed from 5 years of SEC fundamentals + latest market data, ranked within Oil & Gas Field Services, NEC (20 peers). 10 = best in industry, 5 = median, 0 = worst. Refreshed Jun 10, 2026.
Fair value · DCF
Methodology + caveats (click to expand)
Method. 10-year forecast of free cash flow, discounted at the company's WACC, with a Gordon-growth terminal at year 10. FCF is proxied by last fiscal-year net income (proper FCF needs CFO − CapEx by year, which we don't store yet). Beta defaults to 1.0 when not reported.
Why DCF is fragile. Treat the output as a thinking aid, not a verdict. Honest weaknesses of any DCF:
- Growth is the dominant assumption. No one can foresee 10 years of growth — small changes in the slider can double or halve fair value. The reverse-DCF readout above tells you what the market is implicitly assuming; ask yourself whether that's realistic before trusting either number.
- Terminal value dominates. In most DCFs, 60-80% of the answer comes from the terminal-value calculation — i.e., everything AFTER year 10. A 0.5pp change in terminal growth, or in WACC, can swing fair value by 20-30%.
- WACC is itself a guess. We use a textbook CAPM cost of equity (Rf 4.3%, MRP 5.5%, β from the quote) plus a 6% pretax cost of debt — none of these are the company's actual marginal financing cost.
- No moat / disruption modelling. The model assumes the company keeps earning whatever it earns today, compounding cleanly. Competitive shifts, regulatory action, and technology disruption can invalidate the forecast overnight.
- Net income ≠ free cash flow. For capex-heavy names (semis, telcos) net income overstates distributable cash. For low-capex names (software) it understates. Both reduce the precision of the FV figure.
- Reflexivity. A high stock price often becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy via better hiring, financing, and customer trust. DCF can't see this.
Take the DCF, the reverse-DCF implied growth, the historical multiples, and the community sentiment together. When they agree, conviction. When they disagree, the disagreement is the most informative thing on the page.