Latest revenue
$101.1M
as of 2026-03-31
Latest net income
$753.0K
as of 2026-03-31
Net margin
0.7%
as of 2026-03-31
Community sentiment
Where do you think EVI is heading?
Keep private notes on EVI — thesis, target price, catalysts to watch.
Visible only to you. Never shared. Never used to train AI.
EVI vs S&P 500 · rebased to 100
Live market
delayed ≤15 min- Market cap
- $221.9M
- Enterprise value
- $280.3M
- P/E (trailing)
- 29.6×
- Forward P/E
- —
- P/B
- 1.52×
- Dividend yield
- 1.9%
- 52-wk high
- $34.82
- 52-wk low
- $15.61
- Beta
- —
- Shares out
- 12.9M
What this company does
Item 1. Business. General The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on June 13, 1963. The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, is a value-added distributor, and provides advisory and technical services. Through its vast sales organization, the Company provides its customers with planning, designing, and consulting services related to their commercial laundry operations. The Company sells and/or leases its customers commercial laundry equipment, specializing in washing, drying, finishing, material handling, water heating, power generation, and water reuse applications. In support of the suite of products it offers, the Company sells related parts and…
AI summary unavailable — showing raw filing excerpt
Generated from EVI's filing dated 2025-09-11
Key risks
Item 1A. Risk Factors. The Company is subject to various risks and uncertainties, including those described below, which could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and the value of the Company’s common stock. The risks described below are not the only risks faced by the Company. Additional risks not presently known to the Company or other factors that the Company does not presently perceive to present significant risks to the Company may also impair the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, or the value of the Company’s common stock. The risks discussed below also include forward looking…
AI summary unavailable — showing raw filing excerpt
Generated from EVI's filing dated 2025-09-11
ActaClear Score
Computed from 5 years of SEC fundamentals + latest market data, ranked within Services-Personal Services (18 peers). 10 = best in industry, 5 = median, 0 = worst. Refreshed Jun 10, 2026.
Fair value · DCF
Methodology + caveats (click to expand)
Method. 10-year forecast of free cash flow, discounted at the company's WACC, with a Gordon-growth terminal at year 10. FCF is proxied by last fiscal-year net income (proper FCF needs CFO − CapEx by year, which we don't store yet). Beta defaults to 1.0 when not reported.
Why DCF is fragile. Treat the output as a thinking aid, not a verdict. Honest weaknesses of any DCF:
- Growth is the dominant assumption. No one can foresee 10 years of growth — small changes in the slider can double or halve fair value. The reverse-DCF readout above tells you what the market is implicitly assuming; ask yourself whether that's realistic before trusting either number.
- Terminal value dominates. In most DCFs, 60-80% of the answer comes from the terminal-value calculation — i.e., everything AFTER year 10. A 0.5pp change in terminal growth, or in WACC, can swing fair value by 20-30%.
- WACC is itself a guess. We use a textbook CAPM cost of equity (Rf 4.3%, MRP 5.5%, β from the quote) plus a 6% pretax cost of debt — none of these are the company's actual marginal financing cost.
- No moat / disruption modelling. The model assumes the company keeps earning whatever it earns today, compounding cleanly. Competitive shifts, regulatory action, and technology disruption can invalidate the forecast overnight.
- Net income ≠ free cash flow. For capex-heavy names (semis, telcos) net income overstates distributable cash. For low-capex names (software) it understates. Both reduce the precision of the FV figure.
- Reflexivity. A high stock price often becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy via better hiring, financing, and customer trust. DCF can't see this.
Take the DCF, the reverse-DCF implied growth, the historical multiples, and the community sentiment together. When they agree, conviction. When they disagree, the disagreement is the most informative thing on the page.
Historical multiples
How does EVI's current valuation compare to its own past?
P/E uses year-end weekly close ÷ (net income ÷ shares outstanding today). Held shares constant at today's count, which understates the per-share earnings improvement from buybacks over the period. PEG uses 5y revenue CAGR as a proxy for EPS growth — close, but not identical (margin expansion or dilution can drive a wedge). Best read as a comparator across companies and industries, not as a precise replica of historical multiples.