Latest revenue
$9.47B
as of 2026-04-04
Latest net income
$235.1M
as of 2026-04-04
Net margin
2.5%
as of 2026-04-04
Community sentiment
Where do you think ARW is heading?
Keep private notes on ARW — thesis, target price, catalysts to watch.
Visible only to you. Never shared. Never used to train AI.
ARW vs S&P 500 · rebased to 100
Live market
delayed ≤15 min- Market cap
- $11.22B
- Enterprise value
- $13.40B
- P/E (trailing)
- 19.6×
- Forward P/E
- —
- P/B
- 1.66×
- Dividend yield
- 0.0%
- 52-wk high
- $233.30
- 52-wk low
- $101.80
- Beta
- —
- Shares out
- 51.1M
What this company does
Item 1.Business. Arrow Electronics, Inc. (the “company” or “Arrow”) sources and engineers technology for thousands of leading manufacturers, service providers, and users of enterprise computing solutions. The company has one of the world’s broadest portfolios of product offerings available from leading electronic components and enterprise computing solutions suppliers. Equipped with a range of services, solutions, and software, the company helps industrial and commercial customers introduce innovative products, reduce their time to market, and enhance their overall competitiveness. Arrow was incorporated in New York in 1946. Arrow’s diverse worldwide customer base consists of OEMs, VARs,…
AI summary unavailable — showing raw filing excerpt
Generated from ARW's filing dated 2026-02-11
Key risks
Item 1A. Risk Factors. Described below and in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” are certain risks that the company’s management believes are applicable to the company’s business and the industries in which it operates. If any one or more of the described events occur, the company’s business, reputation, results of operations, financial condition, stock price, liquidity, or access to the capital markets could be materially adversely affected. When stated below that a risk may have a material adverse effect on the company’s business, it means that such risk may have one or…
AI summary unavailable — showing raw filing excerpt
Generated from ARW's filing dated 2026-02-11
ActaClear Score
Computed from 5 years of SEC fundamentals + latest market data, ranked within Wholesale-Electronic Parts & Equipment, NEC (9 peers). 10 = best in industry, 5 = median, 0 = worst. Refreshed Jun 10, 2026.
Fair value · DCF
Methodology + caveats (click to expand)
Method. 10-year forecast of free cash flow, discounted at the company's WACC, with a Gordon-growth terminal at year 10. FCF is proxied by last fiscal-year net income (proper FCF needs CFO − CapEx by year, which we don't store yet). Beta defaults to 1.0 when not reported.
Why DCF is fragile. Treat the output as a thinking aid, not a verdict. Honest weaknesses of any DCF:
- Growth is the dominant assumption. No one can foresee 10 years of growth — small changes in the slider can double or halve fair value. The reverse-DCF readout above tells you what the market is implicitly assuming; ask yourself whether that's realistic before trusting either number.
- Terminal value dominates. In most DCFs, 60-80% of the answer comes from the terminal-value calculation — i.e., everything AFTER year 10. A 0.5pp change in terminal growth, or in WACC, can swing fair value by 20-30%.
- WACC is itself a guess. We use a textbook CAPM cost of equity (Rf 4.3%, MRP 5.5%, β from the quote) plus a 6% pretax cost of debt — none of these are the company's actual marginal financing cost.
- No moat / disruption modelling. The model assumes the company keeps earning whatever it earns today, compounding cleanly. Competitive shifts, regulatory action, and technology disruption can invalidate the forecast overnight.
- Net income ≠ free cash flow. For capex-heavy names (semis, telcos) net income overstates distributable cash. For low-capex names (software) it understates. Both reduce the precision of the FV figure.
- Reflexivity. A high stock price often becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy via better hiring, financing, and customer trust. DCF can't see this.
Take the DCF, the reverse-DCF implied growth, the historical multiples, and the community sentiment together. When they agree, conviction. When they disagree, the disagreement is the most informative thing on the page.
Historical multiples
How does ARW's current valuation compare to its own past?
P/E uses year-end weekly close ÷ (net income ÷ shares outstanding today). Held shares constant at today's count, which understates the per-share earnings improvement from buybacks over the period. PEG uses 5y revenue CAGR as a proxy for EPS growth — close, but not identical (margin expansion or dilution can drive a wedge). Best read as a comparator across companies and industries, not as a precise replica of historical multiples.